Talk:Vindheim Awards, Orders, and Honors: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Thank you as always for your work! Two questions : I saw you removed JP & Micauley as the Premiers of the Hawk's Wing - could you help me understand why? For the award names: In the constitution, it lists the awards as "The Award Of (etc)...." and that's the text we had on the page ... but you've updated it to / "(etc), Award o/t". What about that stylistically is preferable? I get that it matches the description in the OP, but it doesn't match the constitution...? - ~~~~") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thank you as always for your work! Two questions : I saw you removed JP & Micauley as the Premiers of the Hawk's Wing - could you help me understand why? For the award names: In the constitution, it lists the awards as "The Award Of (etc)...." and that's the text we had on the page ... but you've updated it to / "(etc), Award o/t". What about that stylistically is preferable? I get that it matches the description in the OP, but it doesn't match the constitution...? - [[User:Zubeydah|Zubeydah]] ([[User talk:Zubeydah|talk]]) 10:04, 25 July 2024 (PDT) | @Estrill: Thank you as always for your work! Two questions : I saw you removed JP & Micauley as the Premiers of the Hawk's Wing - could you help me understand why? For the award names: In the constitution, it lists the awards as "The Award Of (etc)...." and that's the text we had on the page ... but you've updated it to / "(etc), Award o/t". What about that stylistically is preferable? I get that it matches the description in the OP, but it doesn't match the constitution...? - [[User:Zubeydah|Zubeydah]] ([[User talk:Zubeydah|talk]]) 10:04, 25 July 2024 (PDT) | ||
@Zubeydah:Second question first. I personally find it much easier to read now since the first one or two words are the name of the award. And secondly, since we're acquiring quite a list, I was considering alphabetizing them. | |||
Now, the first question. I removed JP & Micauley because 1: technically, for it to be accurate, I would need to add Skeggi & Romanius to the list. 2: This is an award/order that has a very specific requirement to receive it, and therefore, is not an honor that just anyone could receive. You need to be the fighter who won Coronet & then served successfully for six months. It will be automatic, henceforth, on who receives it. And 3: I was considering removing Deanna's name from the Dove listing for those same reasons. - [[User:Estrill]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 25 July 2024
@Estrill: Thank you as always for your work! Two questions : I saw you removed JP & Micauley as the Premiers of the Hawk's Wing - could you help me understand why? For the award names: In the constitution, it lists the awards as "The Award Of (etc)...." and that's the text we had on the page ... but you've updated it to / "(etc), Award o/t". What about that stylistically is preferable? I get that it matches the description in the OP, but it doesn't match the constitution...? - Zubeydah (talk) 10:04, 25 July 2024 (PDT)
@Zubeydah:Second question first. I personally find it much easier to read now since the first one or two words are the name of the award. And secondly, since we're acquiring quite a list, I was considering alphabetizing them. Now, the first question. I removed JP & Micauley because 1: technically, for it to be accurate, I would need to add Skeggi & Romanius to the list. 2: This is an award/order that has a very specific requirement to receive it, and therefore, is not an honor that just anyone could receive. You need to be the fighter who won Coronet & then served successfully for six months. It will be automatic, henceforth, on who receives it. And 3: I was considering removing Deanna's name from the Dove listing for those same reasons. - User:Estrill
